Selcoth Burn Afforestation

Enhancing native biodiversity, providing a sustainable timber resource, and supporting rural development

Selcoth Burn is a woodland in southern Scotland. It is made up of three enclosures combining productive broadleaves, conifers and low-density native woodland. The woodland aims to maximise benefits to native biodiversity while providing a sustainable future timber resource and a range of sustainable wood products, helping to support rural development through farm diversification.

The project has been designed with a strong emphasis on protecting rare plants and enhancing existing important habitats to improve local biodiversity, benefiting species such as black grouse and golden eagles. The project will start the return of native woodland to Selcoth glen by connecting and expanding fragmented native ancient woodland remnants, while simultaneously improving water quality and contributing to flood prevention over its 65-year crediting period.

The project developer, Forest Carbon, focuses on on woodland creation and peatland restoration projects for carbon capture and ecosystem services in the United Kingdom. Working with businesses and land holders since 2006, they've helped fund the planting of over 13 million trees and the restoration of 2,000 hectares of degraded peatlands. These projects will remove 3.3 million tonnes of CO2e from the atmosphere while providing a host of important benefits to society including flood mitigation, enhanced biodiversity, and increased public access.

Read More

Project location

Technology and mechanism

Afforestation
Planting trees in a previously unforested area.
Mechanism
Removal
Durability
Permanence: 65+ years
The durability of this project is 65 years, based on its crediting period (65 years).

Project certifications

Patch requires all projects on the marketplace to have its methodology, project design, and outcomes verified by an approved third party. For more on our project vetting and onboarding process, review our Trust and Safety Framework.

Certifier

Registry ID

Project registration date

Most recent Jun 22, 2022

Crediting period term

Jan 04, 2021 - Jan 03, 2086

Project methodology

Updated Mar 01, 2021
Verified by Soil Association Certification Ltd

Project design document (PDD)

Updated Mar 01, 2021
Verified by Soil Association Certification Ltd

Current verifier of project outcomes

Soil Association Certification Ltd

Project details

Emissions reduced or carbon removed on an annual basis
214 tonnes
How the project approaches risk of reversal
The project is exposed to minimal reversal risk. Fire is considered an unlikely risk as the woodlands are in a fairly isolated location with limited public access. The layout of the planting areas also provide natural breaks (roads/watercourses) combined with diverse species compositions to further reduce fire risk. Much of the land surrounding the sites is still grazed by sheep and, as a result, has much reduced fuel accumulation. The design of the woodland provides its own natural buffer to winds, with low-density species on the margins and on exposed ridges and the use of wind-firm species tolerant to exposure such as scots pine and birch on the more exposed slopes. Drought is very unlikely as this location is within a relatively high rainfall area, and all of the sites are situated on hillsides receiving water from above. In a similar vein, flood risk is low as there are no areas of the site within level ground that floods. The topography and soils of the site would suggest that the risk of natural disturbance is unlikely. Similarly, for pests and disease, the sites are protected within fenced enclosures (vole guards). The use of a diverse range of species in the layout reduces the overall risk further. Also, all key species are tolerant of climatic fluctuations within this range, and as above, the wider use of a diverse mix of tree species focused on the right soil types should further reduce this risk.
What actions would be taken by the project developer if anticipated emissions reductions do not take place, or if carbon removal is reversed in the future?
In the event of a potential reversal, the project's buffer account allocation acts as a safety measure to cover the potential loss of carbon credits.
What calculation methods are used to independently reproduce and verify the carbon impact of the project?
Please refer to Section 8 of the methodology document.
Citation: Methodology
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
Climate Action
Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts
Life on Land
Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Partnerships for the Goals
Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development

See inventory and pricing for this project

Not a Patch customer?